Peiró ask Macron to change the law

Peiró wishes to go to see Macron to ask him to change the law and the French Constitution. The State has not appealed to the judgment of the administrative court that has definitively stopped the yard bypass site.

Peiró wishes to go to see macron to ask him to change the law and the French Constitution.

This position of the state is perfectly logical, in agreement with its driving line from the beginning and in a very consistent way.

Yet germinal peiró has been eager to say that the state is responsible for this beginning of the construction site accusing him or “washing his hands”.
He tirelessly wields a letter from édouard Philippe by believing that it is a letter of support while it is actually only a letter reminiscent of administrative procedures, and precisely without any position.

G Peiró even went further by declaring: “the state is inconsistent and inconsistent”

Peiró wishes to go to see macron to ask him to change the law and the French Constitution.

But this man who doubts about nothing has short memory.
So let’s come back together on the events of this file and the positions of the state that are in nothing similar to what is trying to make peiró believe.

First of all, and this is fundamental to understand the logical suite of events and the quite unbiased position of the state, it is necessary to know that peiró did not ask for any financial aid from the state, which is very surprising for such a Project , especially when it now claims that this project would be major public interest … but then why does it decide to make everything pay by the périgourdins ??? Usually, no project or this size, if it is justified, Auto is funded by a department only. For example, the new crossing of beynac has received state grants … because it was a project of general interest.
In reality, this lack of application for a grant to the state is already the confession that germinal peiró knows himself that this project is not of major public interest and that it would never be passed if the state was involved.

The deviation of Beynac
Peiró wishes to go to see macron to ask him to change the law and the French Constitution.
The deviation of Beynac
The deviation of Beynac; Peiró wishes to go to see macron to ask him to change the law and the French Constitution.
STOP otherwise this will be the past “NON AU MASSACRE DE LA VALEE”
it would never be passed if the state was involved.
it would never be passed if the state was involved…

But above all, this has a very precise purpose:

  • Germinal Peiró, thanks to this process, has free hands to act, it strengthens its power and its fields of action on this project. The Authorizations for the project will then be given by local and departmental bodies that are submitted, for many of them, to the influence and pressure of the department.
  • in addition, the state has no administrative reason to oppose this circumvention, which is perfectly logical with decentralization and the fact that it does not participate financially.

But despite this, the state has yet (and exemplary) tasks its responsibilities and all the necessary precautions to warning g peiró of the risk that he took if he did not wait for the end of the remedies before starting his construction site:

Peiró wishes to go to see macron to ask him to change the law and the French Constitution.
“NON AU MASSACRE DE LA VALEE”
  • it is first with the dordogne of the dordogne: on the decree authorizing the work she had well warned peiró about the fact that there would be recourse and on the risk he took. (Doc 1)
  • then the state has tasks its responsibility again by deciding on an exceptional way to do a mission by the cedd to assess the opportunity of this project.
  • from this very thorough study, it emerged that the state through the ministry of ecology puts it on guard and asks him to wait before doing the work by requestionnant the opportunity of deviation.
  • the ministries have a letter sent to request a moratorium.

In Short, the state has since the beginning warned about the irresponsibility that would be such a risk or risk, but peira has only been doing and swept away all these recommendations from the state of a hand setback.

Here’s the reality !!

The deviation of Beynac; Peiró wishes to go to see macron to ask him to change the law and the French Constitution.
The deviation of Beynac “NON AU MASSACRE DE LA VALEE”

Peiró is the one and only responsible for this failure.

Peiró wishes to go to see macron to ask him to change the law and the French Constitution.
“NON AU MASSACRE DE LA VALEE”

Now, justice has definitively stopped this construction site for reasons that have yet been developed by associations with the department well before the beginning of the work …

Peiró’s oversized obsession and ego go further today and he makes all the mayors or the department believe that there is a problem in French Justice.

Peiró wishes to go to see macron to ask him to change the law and the French Constitution.

Peiró wishes to go to see a macron to ask him to change the law and the French Constitution.

  • he wants the remedies to be “Framed” !!! ???

What does he want to say? Let the remedies be framed …. Under-heard by the state ??
Let the state oversee the functioning of justice ??

Peiro...to change the law and the French Constitution.
“NON AU MASSACRE DE LA VALEE”

Exactly !!! This man is simply against democracy !!!!
In fact this man, to the Stalinist mentality, is simply against the separation of powers that is the very base of democracy !! Of course he wishes the judges to be under guardianship and that they cannot in any case counter his Local Supremacy.
So if this french justice dared to oppose his project, germinal peiró says: you have to frame it ….. and prevent him from interacting on my sovereignty and my all power.

Maison Atelier Pierre - Beynac-Cazenac-Dordogne; Peiró wishes to go to see macron to ...
“NON AU MASSACRE DE LA VALEE”Maison Atelier Pierre – Beynac-Cazenac-Dordogne

I tell you: the only person who has been framed and put under guardianship is him and him alone! For the well-being of the dordogne …. for the well-being of France.

The State has not appealed to the judgment of the administrative court that has definitively stopped the yard bypass site.
The State has not appealed to the judgment of the administrative court that has definitively stopped the yard bypass site.
Peiró wishes to go to see macron to ask him to change the law and the French Constitution.
“NON AU MASSACRE DE LA VALEE”

Kind regards Pierre

%d bloggers liken dit: